The Nabataeans: A Powerful and Unconquered People

The Nabataeans were a powerful and unconquered people who inhabited North Arabia, a region known for its difficult terrain and strategic location in the spice and incense trade.

Origins and History

The Nabataeans were an Arabic tribe that inhabited the region of modern-day Jordan during the Bronze and Iron Ages. They were first mentioned by name in 312 BCE, during the “Nabataean Confrontations,” when the Macedonian Antigonid Dynasty launched three failed raids to seize control of the Nabataeans’ valuable bitumen industry.

Despite limited historical evidence, it’s clear that trade was crucial to the Nabataeans, with Greek historian Diodoros Sikelos describing their wealth and spice trade. The Nabataeans continued to thrive, expanding their state and becoming allies with the Maccabees in their revolt against the Seleucid Empire around 167 BCE.

Relationship with the Jewish Kingdom and Rome

The Nabataeans had a tumultuous relationship with the Jewish Kingdom, marked by on-and-off skirmishes, raids, and prisoner-taking. By the 2nd century BCE, this evolved into a major clash, with Nabataean kings Aretas II and Obodas I facing off against the Hasmonean dynasty.

Under King Aretas III, the Nabataeans briefly conquered Damascus and attempted to expand into Judaea and Palmyra, but were eventually thwarted by Roman intervention. The Romans, who had been allies with surrounding states, began to fight the Nabataeans, even besieging Petra in 62 BCE, although they eventually withdrew after accepting a bribe.

Annexation into the Roman Empire

The Nabataean Kingdom faced various invasions and power struggles, including an invasion by Herod the Great, backed by Kleopatra of Egypt, which ended in a stalemate. As Rome’s influence grew in the region, the Nabataeans eventually allied themselves with the Romans, avoiding conflict and ultimately leading to a peaceful annexation of Nabataea into the Roman Empire as the Province of Arabia Petraea in 106 CE.

Roman Period and Legacy

The Roman Period brought significant changes to Nabataea’s influence on world trade, as new naval routes emerged and the Romans exerted greater control over trade routes. The region remained loyal to the Roman Empire, unlike other governors in Syria who revolted, and was rewarded with territorial expansions.

The Nabataeans were skilled traders and craftspeople, controlling the bitumen and incense industries, and their clay lamps featured beautiful designs and Greek mythological scenes, indicating a rich cultural heritage. The Nabataeans, ancestors of Muslims in the Islamic Golden Age, showcased remarkable sophistication in their city of Petra, featuring astronomically aligned landmarks, large markets, and rock-cut buildings that provided coolness from the desert sun.

The Nabataeans worshipped a diverse pantheon of deities, including native Arabian gods like Dushara and Al-‘Uzza, as well as Greek, Roman, Egyptian, and Syrian gods, reflecting the region’s cultural exchange and Hellenisation. The Nabataeans, a cosmopolitan people, blended their indigenous Arabic roots with customs from other cultures.

In the Late Antique Period, Christianity and Greek language spread in Nabataea, replacing Aramaic, while the Nabataeans likely continued speaking an Arabic dialect among themselves. By the 6th century CE, Petra’s importance waned, and the Nabataeans’ name disappeared, replaced by the Ghassanids, a new Arabian force that emerged as vassals of the Eastern Romans.

The Nabataeans’ legacy continues to thrive in the gardens and temples of Petra, forts of Bosra, and oases of modern-day Jordan, showcasing their cultural ingenuity in turning harsh environments into paradises. The Nabataeans remain an inspiration, demonstrating how to forge beauty in unforgiving terrains and prosper autonomously in a land of empires, leaving behind a legacy more precious than any treasure.

Term	Definition	Example Usage
Annexation	The act of incorporating a territory or state into a larger entity, such as an empire or kingdom.	The Nabataean Kingdom was annexed into the Roman Empire as the Province of Arabia Petraea in 106 CE.
Bitumen	A type of sticky, tar-like substance extracted from oil or natural deposits, often used in construction and trade.	The Nabataeans controlled the bitumen industry, which was a valuable resource in their region.
Cosmopolitan	Describing a city or culture that is diverse and influenced by many different cultures or nations.	The Nabataeans were a cosmopolitan people, blending their indigenous Arabic roots with customs from other cultures.
Hellenisation	The process of adopting Greek culture, language, and customs, often through trade and cultural exchange.	The Nabataeans’ worship of Greek, Roman, Egyptian, and Syrian gods reflects their Hellenisation.
Inconquered	Not conquered or defeated by another power or force.	The Nabataeans were an unconquered people, maintaining their independence despite being surrounded by powerful empires.
Pantheon	A collection of gods or goddesses worshipped by a particular culture or religion.	The Nabataeans worshipped a diverse pantheon of deities, including native Arabian gods and gods from other cultures.
Roman Period	The period of time during which the Roman Empire had significant influence or control over a particular region or people.	The Roman Period brought significant changes to Nabataea’s influence on world trade and its relationship with the Roman Empire.
Spice Trade	The trade of valuable spices, such as incense, cinnamon, and pepper, often used for culinary and medicinal purposes.	The Nabataeans controlled the spice trade, which was a crucial aspect of their economy and culture.
Unforgiving	Describing an environment or situation that is harsh, difficult, or challenging to survive in.	The Nabataeans demonstrated their cultural ingenuity in turning harsh environments into paradises.
Vassals	People or states that are subject to the control or protection of a more powerful ruler or empire.	The Ghassanids were a new Arabian force that emerged as vassals of the Eastern Romans.

 

Vocabulary Quiz: The Nabataeans

Choose the correct answer for each question:

1. What does the word “tumultuous” mean in the context of the Nabataeans’ relationship with the Jewish Kingdom?
   • A) peaceful and harmonious
   • B) marked by on-and-off conflicts and struggles
   • C) characterized by mutual respect and admiration
   • D) based on mutual distrust and suspicion
2. What is the meaning of the word “Hellenisation” in the context of the Nabataeans’ cultural exchange?
   • A) the adoption of Arabic customs by other cultures
   • B) the spread of Greek language and culture
   • C) the blending of Roman and Egyptian traditions
   • D) the influence of Syrian gods on Nabataean worship
3. What does the word “cosmopolitan” describe about the Nabataeans?
   • A) their isolation from other cultures
   • B) their blending of indigenous Arabic roots with customs from other cultures
   • C) their exclusive worship of Arabian gods
   • D) their limited knowledge of the outside world
4. What is the meaning of the word “vassals” in the context of the Ghassanids’ relationship with the Eastern Romans?
   • A) independent rulers of their own kingdom
   • B) subordinate rulers under the authority of another power
   • C) allies in a military alliance
   • D) rival powers in a struggle for dominance
5. What does the word “ingenuity” describe about the Nabataeans’ ability to thrive in harsh environments?
   • A) their lack of creativity in solving problems
   • B) their skill and cleverness in finding innovative solutions
   • C) their reliance on luck and chance
   • D) their dependence on outside help and resources

Answer Key:

1. B) marked by on-and-off conflicts and struggles
2. B) the spread of Greek language and culture
3. B) their blending of indigenous Arabic roots with customs from other cultures
4. B) subordinate rulers under the authority of another power
5. B) their skill and cleverness in finding innovative solutions

 

---

The Use of the Passive Voice in Historical Writing

 

Explanation

The passive voice is often used in historical writing to describe events, actions, and processes that occurred in the past. It helps to focus on the recipient of the action rather than the doer, which can be unknown or unimportant in historical contexts. In the provided text, the passive voice is used to describe various events, such as “were first mentioned”, “was launched”, “were thwarted”, “was besieged”, and “were rewarded”. This grammatical structure allows the writer to emphasize the events themselves rather than the people or forces behind them, creating a more objective and formal tone.

Quiz: The Use of the Passive Voice in Historical Writing

 

1. In the sentence “The Nabataeans were first mentioned by name in 312 BCE”, the passive voice is used to:
a) Emphasize the doer of the action
b) Focus on the recipient of the action
c) Create a more formal tone
d) All of the above

 

2. Which of the following sentences uses the passive voice?
a) The Macedonian Antigonid Dynasty launched three failed raids.
b) The Nabataeans were besieged by the Romans in 62 BCE.
c) The Nabataeans continued to thrive and expanded their state.
d) The Romans eventually withdrew after accepting a bribe.

 

3. What is the effect of using the passive voice in historical writing?
a) It creates a more personal tone
b) It emphasizes the doer of the action
c) It allows the writer to focus on the events themselves
d) It makes the writing more informal

 

4. Identify the passive voice construction in the sentence “The Nabataeans were rewarded with territorial expansions.”
a) were rewarded
b) with territorial expansions
c) The Nabataeans
d) by the Romans

 

5. Why is the passive voice often used in historical writing?
a) To create a more formal tone
b) To emphasize the doer of the action
c) To focus on the recipient of the action
d) Because it is easier to use than the active voice

 

Answer Key

1. d) All of the above
2. b) The Nabataeans were besieged by the Romans in 62 BCE.
3. c) It allows the writer to focus on the events themselves
4. a) were rewarded
5. a) To create a more formal tone